Absences and Returns
Wow. It's been how long since I last posted?
My wife and I have returned from our honeymoon. We went on an Antarctic cruise. If ever you have the chance, gentle reader, you must go. The landscape will overwhelm you. Air so clean, snow so white, ice so blue . . . and the wildlife. Penguins, seabirds, whales, seals, and more. I feel renewed, and more than ever distanced from these petty little matters we concern ourselves with in our everyday lives.
Like the nomination of Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court. The Democrats managed to make themselves look more foolish than usual with their attempted fillibuster. Doomed before it started. The committee vote told the story, and the general vote will confirm it: there is no real objection to Alito's credentials. The vote was strictly party line. The only thing the Democrats have on Alito is that Bush nominated him. That's their real objection, and that was fully exposed by the last several days' shenanigans.
I thought it would be Judge Roberts who would get the full-on Bork treatment from the Left. Turns out they were waiting for Alito. Who knew?
Anyway, as I type this it's looking like a few Democrats have realized how silly their party is acting (election looming this year, don'cha know) and are joining the Republicans to put Alito well over the top in terms of votes. Tomorrow morning will tell the tale, but it looks fairly certain from here.
UPDATE
Like I thought, the final vote for Alito went almost perfectly along party lines. It wasn't about his qualifications or his beliefs, it was about being nominated by an unpopular Republican president. Nothing more.
Already the sad, predictable cries of The End Of The World As We Know It are coming from the Left. What rubbish.
In other news, this item in the Weekly Standard seems to me a good "alternative" view on the current state of things with regards to the War on Terror and US relations with China. Ralph Peters is playing around with long-term thinking here, which is rare for anyone in the press.
Here's a quote from the article that I like - Even in the days before mass media, assassins terrorized civilizations. Today, their deeds are amplified by a toxic, breathtakingly irresponsible communications culture that spans the globe. .
Here's another, somewhat more fiery - Those who feel no vital faith cannot comprehend faith's power. A man or woman who has never been intoxicated by belief will default to mirror-imaging when asked to describe terror's roots. He who has never experienced a soul-shaking glimpse of the divine inevitably explains religion-driven suicide bombers in terms of a lack of economic opportunity or social humiliation. But the enemies we face are burning with belief, on fire with their vision of an immanent, angry god. Our intelligentsia is less equipped to understand such men than our satellites are to find them.
I think Peters may be a bit off-base here . . . both sides of American politics certainly have their share of the blindly faithful. One has only to scan thru the political blogs I have linked to the right of this page to see that. Pay particular attention to Jurassic Pork. There's a man so consumed by his unreasoning hatred that he fills page after page with relentless venom.
And let's not overlook MoltenThought, which recently posted this sadly typical piece attacking "darwinism" (more properly known as the theory of evolution by natural selection) in a manner all too common to the religious right, demonstrating a profound lack of understanding of the scientific method and the wide acceptance by the scientific community of Darwin's essential thesis.
It's always the same, two groups of polarized children screaming at one another to no effect. We here in the middle, gentle reader, we who look askance at both sides and their ever-mounting blasts of vitriol, we are the ones who must balance all the fulcrums. We keep it all working. Even if, sometimes, it hardly seems worth the effort.
Such as is demonstrated by the Palestinian people electing the homicidal thugs of Hamas as their chosen government. Democracy in action, and living up to the old line that "we get the government we deserve" with excruciating perfection. They have dug their pit to a new level, those poor misguided people. Six thousand years and more of ceaseless violence, and still they haven't tired of killing one another in that region.
But I remember glaciers and icebergs, and take comfort from the clean cold air of Antarctica. Sooner or later, the species will either mature beyond these foolish habits or drive itself extinct. And the world will still be here.
My wife and I have returned from our honeymoon. We went on an Antarctic cruise. If ever you have the chance, gentle reader, you must go. The landscape will overwhelm you. Air so clean, snow so white, ice so blue . . . and the wildlife. Penguins, seabirds, whales, seals, and more. I feel renewed, and more than ever distanced from these petty little matters we concern ourselves with in our everyday lives.
Like the nomination of Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court. The Democrats managed to make themselves look more foolish than usual with their attempted fillibuster. Doomed before it started. The committee vote told the story, and the general vote will confirm it: there is no real objection to Alito's credentials. The vote was strictly party line. The only thing the Democrats have on Alito is that Bush nominated him. That's their real objection, and that was fully exposed by the last several days' shenanigans.
I thought it would be Judge Roberts who would get the full-on Bork treatment from the Left. Turns out they were waiting for Alito. Who knew?
Anyway, as I type this it's looking like a few Democrats have realized how silly their party is acting (election looming this year, don'cha know) and are joining the Republicans to put Alito well over the top in terms of votes. Tomorrow morning will tell the tale, but it looks fairly certain from here.
UPDATE
Like I thought, the final vote for Alito went almost perfectly along party lines. It wasn't about his qualifications or his beliefs, it was about being nominated by an unpopular Republican president. Nothing more.
Already the sad, predictable cries of The End Of The World As We Know It are coming from the Left. What rubbish.
In other news, this item in the Weekly Standard seems to me a good "alternative" view on the current state of things with regards to the War on Terror and US relations with China. Ralph Peters is playing around with long-term thinking here, which is rare for anyone in the press.
Here's a quote from the article that I like - Even in the days before mass media, assassins terrorized civilizations. Today, their deeds are amplified by a toxic, breathtakingly irresponsible communications culture that spans the globe. .
Here's another, somewhat more fiery - Those who feel no vital faith cannot comprehend faith's power. A man or woman who has never been intoxicated by belief will default to mirror-imaging when asked to describe terror's roots. He who has never experienced a soul-shaking glimpse of the divine inevitably explains religion-driven suicide bombers in terms of a lack of economic opportunity or social humiliation. But the enemies we face are burning with belief, on fire with their vision of an immanent, angry god. Our intelligentsia is less equipped to understand such men than our satellites are to find them.
I think Peters may be a bit off-base here . . . both sides of American politics certainly have their share of the blindly faithful. One has only to scan thru the political blogs I have linked to the right of this page to see that. Pay particular attention to Jurassic Pork. There's a man so consumed by his unreasoning hatred that he fills page after page with relentless venom.
And let's not overlook MoltenThought, which recently posted this sadly typical piece attacking "darwinism" (more properly known as the theory of evolution by natural selection) in a manner all too common to the religious right, demonstrating a profound lack of understanding of the scientific method and the wide acceptance by the scientific community of Darwin's essential thesis.
It's always the same, two groups of polarized children screaming at one another to no effect. We here in the middle, gentle reader, we who look askance at both sides and their ever-mounting blasts of vitriol, we are the ones who must balance all the fulcrums. We keep it all working. Even if, sometimes, it hardly seems worth the effort.
Such as is demonstrated by the Palestinian people electing the homicidal thugs of Hamas as their chosen government. Democracy in action, and living up to the old line that "we get the government we deserve" with excruciating perfection. They have dug their pit to a new level, those poor misguided people. Six thousand years and more of ceaseless violence, and still they haven't tired of killing one another in that region.
But I remember glaciers and icebergs, and take comfort from the clean cold air of Antarctica. Sooner or later, the species will either mature beyond these foolish habits or drive itself extinct. And the world will still be here.
posted by Lanz at 9:56 PM
2 Comments:
Hey Lanz-
Congrats to you and your missus and thanks for the link.
I understand the scientific method quite well---80 pct of my job is hypothesis testing. My problem with Darwinism is not the observable, tested natural selection which I call small-e evolution---it's the big-e Evolution Gould and the materialists have tarted up as The Universal Explanation for Life, the Universe, and Everything. That sort of thing is rather hard to hypothesis test, since the claim is made it's only observable over geologic time.
My beef has little to do with religion and more to do with small sample sizes and questionable interpretation. To be perfectly frank, I'm deeply suspicious of anyone who devotes their lifetime to studying something they claim they've already figured out.
In any case, I continue to enjoy your blog, and wish I'd thought up that name---it's brilliant.
(Sorry it took me so long to visit but I didn't know you had a blog!)
Wow, an Antarctic cruise! That sounds amazing, but how did you not freeze your asses off? I'm kind of afraid of snow, myself.
And I really liked what you said about how the hatred has piled up too much on both sides of the political spectrum. You're right, it doesn't seem worth the effort sometimes. I can't understand how we all seem to want the same basic things: safety, a roof over our heads, a decent living for ourselves and our children--and yet disagree so vehemently about the best way to get them.
Post a Comment
<< Home